Database of Arbitrators and Mediators

The MIAC Database features a global pool of both highly experienced and new arbitrators as well as mediators, drawn from civil and common law jurisdictions around the world.

In creating an online Database, MIAC aims to create a useful resource to users, and at the same time bring to the fore the recognized talent of arbitrators and mediators from Africa, Asia, and beyond.

The Database is freely accessible to the public for assistance in identifying appropriate arbitrators for specific cases. Appointments by the MIAC appointing authority may also draw upon, but would not be limited to, the Database. While MIAC encourages qualified individuals to join the Database, inclusion in the Database does not entail an endorsement or certification by MIAC.

formidable test search

Mr. Arthur Xiao Dong

Founding Partner

AnJie Law Firm

Gender: Male

Nationality: Chinese

Country: China

Email Address:


Languages: Mandarin (Native), English (Fluent)

Experience as sole arbitrator: Yes

Experience as co-arbitrator: Yes

Experience as presiding arbitrator: Yes

Experience as counsel in arbitration proceedings: Yes

Experience as Mediator: Yes

Legal systems: Civil Law

Bar Admission: The People’s Republic of China, 1996

Fields of arbitration specialization: Corporate law / M&A, Distribution/Franchising, Intellectual Property, Investment law, Shipping & Commodities


Challenges to Arbitral Awards in China, LexisNexis, 2018
Enterprises in China’s FTZs Enter 2017 with New Options for Arbitration, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 2017
Allocation of Costs in Arbitration a Chinese Perspective, Thomson Reuters, 2017
Corralling Defaulting Parties and their Unpaid Costs Deposits under the SIAC Rules 2016, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 2017
Arbitrability of PPP disputes in China, IBA Newsletter, 2016
Public Policy Defense in the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, Arbitration and Law, 2016
Abuse of Process and Regulation in Commercial Arbitration-A Chinese Perspective, Journal of Arbitration Studies, 2015
Challenging Jurisdiction and Anti-suit Provisions in China’s Arbitration Practice, LexisNexis, 2015
Supreme People’s Court Further Clarifies the Criteria for Determining the Validity of Foreign Related Arbitration Clauses, China Business Law Journal, 2015
Interim Measures in Support of Commercial Arbitration in China, LexisNexis, 2015
Reflections on HKIAC’s Revised Model Arbitration Clause and its Impact on Chinese Practice, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 2014
Does Supreme People’s Court’s Decision Open the Door for Foreign Arbitration Institutions to Explore the Chinese Market?, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 2014
Is an Infringement Claim within the Scope of Arbitration Clause under Laws of PRC?, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 2014
Significant Changes Proposed in Beijing Arbitration Commission’s (‘BAC’) New Rules, LexisNexis, 2014
Ten Highlights of the China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone Arbitration Rules, (2014), LexisNexis, 2014 U.S. Court Upholds the Finality and Enforceability of an Award Rendered by Emergency Arbitrator, LexisNexis, 2014
China Supreme People’s Court Holds that a Dispute Must Meet “Foreign-Related” Requirement for Arbitration at Foreign Arbitration Forums, LexisNexis, 2013
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards in China, China Business Law Journal, 2013
Study on the Competence – Competence Rule, Forum on Arbitration and Judicial Review, 2013
Chinese Arbitration Law, LexisNexis, 2015
Commencing the Arbitration, Limitation Periods, and Interim Measures in Chinese Arbitration Law, LexisNexis, 2015
Introduction to Chinese Arbitration Law in Chinese Arbitration Law, LexisNexis, 2015

CV: Click here to download