Database of Arbitrators and Mediators
The MIAC Database features a global pool of both highly experienced and new arbitrators as well as mediators, drawn from civil and common law jurisdictions around the world.
In creating an online Database, MIAC aims to create a useful resource to users, and at the same time bring to the fore the recognized talent of arbitrators and mediators from Africa, Asia, and beyond.
The Database is freely accessible to the public for assistance in identifying appropriate arbitrators for specific cases. Appointments by the MIAC appointing authority may also draw upon, but would not be limited to, the Database. While MIAC encourages qualified individuals to join the Database, inclusion in the Database does not entail an endorsement or certification by MIAC.
Mr. David Wilson
Member
Sherman & Howard L.L.C.
Gender: Male
Nationality: American
Country: United States
Email Address: dwilson@shermanhoward.com
Languages: English (Native), Spanish (Working knowledge), French (Working knowledge)
Experience as sole arbitrator: Yes
Experience as co-arbitrator: Yes
Experience as presiding arbitrator: Yes
Experience as counsel in arbitration proceedings: Yes
Experience as Mediator: Yes, 3 cases
Legal systems: Common Law
Bar Admission: Colorado, USA, 1986 , England and Wales, 2013
Fields of arbitration specialization: Commercial arbitration, Corporate law / M&A, Distribution/Franchising, Energy & Natural Resources, Intellectual Property, Sales & Purchases, Technologies, Telecommunications
Publications:
Co-Author, “Tortious Interference: Colorado,” THOMSON REUTERS PRACTICAL LAW (2022); Co-Author, “Breach of Fiduciary Duty: Colorado,” THOMSON REUTERS PRACTICAL LAW (2022); Co-Author, “Fraud: Colorado,” THOMSON REUTERS PRACTICAL LAW (2021); “Co-author, “Issues for Arbitrators to Consider Regarding Experts,” ICC DISPUTE RESOLUTION BULLETIN 2021, Issue No. 2 (originally published, ICC INT’L COURT OF ARBITRATION BULLETIN, Vol. 21, No. 1 (2010)); Co-author, “Issues for Experts Acting Under the ICC Rules for Expertise or the ICC Rules of Arbitration,” ICC DISPUTE RESOLUTION BULLETIN 2021, Issue No. 2 (originally published, ICC INT’L COURT OF ARBITRATION BULLETIN, Vol. 20, No. 1 (2009)); Co-author, “Emergency Arbitrator Rules Among Four Major Arbitral Institutions: Both Alike and Different, Expert Guides (March 2019); Co-author, “An Updated Overview of Issues to Consider When Using Information Technology in Int’l Arbitration,” ICC INT’L COURT OF ARBITRATION BULLETIN (April 2017); Author, “An Overview of U.S. Federal Court Decisions Regarding Interim Remedies in Int’l Commercial Arbitration,” INT’L COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION: NATURAL RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT, AND TECHNOLOGY DISPUTES, Canadian Bar Assoc. (2005); Co-author, “Explanatory Notes on the Standards,” ICC INT’L COURT OF ARBITRATION BULLETIN: Special Supplement on Using Technology to Resolve Business Disputes (2004); Co-author, “Investment in Europe: An Overview of Common Legal Issues,” THE COLORADO LAWYER (June 2002); Author, “How U.S. Courts Interpret Arbitration Agreements,” INT’L DISTRIBUTION LAW (Siefarth ed.), Transnational Publishers (2001); Author, “Recognition and Enforcement of Money Judgments in U.S. Courts,” INT’L JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE IN CIVIL MATTERS (Prell ed.), Transnational Publishers (1999).